Research Impact Value and LIS #LIS_RIVAL: resources and review

#lis_rival delegate packsTwo weeks ago on 11th July 2018 my Centre for Social Informatics colleague Dr Bruce Ryan and I hosted Research Impact Value and LIS (#lis_rival).

This was a lively, sell-out one-day event on the theme of library and information science (LIS) research impact and value at Edinburgh Napier University’s Craiglockhart campus.

#lis_rival brought together 33 delegates from a range of stakeholder groups including academic, health, national, prison, public, and special librarians, as well as LIS academics, officers from the Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals (CILIP – the main UK professional body for information and knowledge workers), and independent consultants.

Over the past few days Bruce and I have been pulling together the resources created for/on the day – notably photographs, and video footage of presentations – and analysing delegate feedback on the event. We have also been dealing with the usual post-event admin, such as thanking everyone who supported the work that went into such a successful gathering, and paying our bills. Now that this is done, we are able to reflect on the work presented at #lis_rival, and possible future initiatives that may emerge from the many discussions amongst the delegates on the day.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

The aims of #lis_rival were to bring together library and information science researchers, librarians, and other library stakeholders to: (1) explore concepts and examples of the impact and value of LIS research to services delivery in practice; (2) encourage the strengthening of links between these interacting communities; (3) narrow gaps between LIS research and practice; and (4) lay the ground for future research-related support and collaborations across the sector. In the advertised programme we also promised ‘contributions on the impact and value of past investments at national level to support LIS research in the UK – notably the Library and Information Science Research Coalition (2009-2012) and the Developing Research Excellence and Methods (DREaM) project (2011-2012) – and new proposed initiatives to provide the necessary infrastructure for future support in the field’.

These aims were addressed primarily through the provision of a number of presentations:

All but one of the presentations are available on SlideShare in a large single file. Stella’s presentation is available separately. My own presentation is available in the large single file, and also separately. Individual PDFs of the slide decks can be downloaded from the table below, as can video footage.

Speaker Organisation Title Video Slides (PDFs)
Hazel Hall Edinburgh Napier University Conceptualisations of LIS research impact and value:
Learning from the LIS Research Coalition and DREaM
video slides
Paul Gooding University of East Anglia The Digital Library Futures Project: How does e-Legal deposit shape our “digital universe”? (Short presentation) video slides
Yvonne Morris Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals (CILIP) Developing a sector-wide research and evidence base portal (Short presentation) video slides
Andrew McTaggart Edinburgh City Libraries Using data in lifelong learning: examples of recent data collection and use in Libraries (Short presentation) video slides
Sara Wingate Gray University College London Imagine that! Public libraries and the fiction reading public, 1800 – 2013 (Short presentation) video slides
Stella Wisdom British Library Playing and making in libraries (Short presentation) video slides
Leo Appleton Edinburgh Napier University and Goldsmiths, University of London Exploring the impact and value of UK public libraries through the analysis of longitudinal focus group data video slides
Alison Brettle University of Salford Exploring the impact and promoting the value of LIS research in the UK: what next? video slides

We were also keen to encourage the strengthening of connections between delegates at the event, not least because (unusually for a meeting of this small size) it brought together such a diverse range of stakeholders. We therefore provided slots for ‘unstructured’ networking with half an hour for coffee/tea at registration and a full hour for lunch, and a 45 minute tea break in the afternoon. The latter also offered delegates the option of a short guided tour of the Edinburgh Napier University War Poets Collection. In addition we encouraged delegates to contribute to the agenda for the afternoon by suggesting topics for 45 minutes of group discussion in the last session before Alison Brettle‘s closing keynote. These suggestions were recorded on ‘ideas cards’ over the course of the morning sessions, submitted to ‘the spotty bag’, then reframed as discussion questions by the organisers during the lunch break.

#lis_rival discussion questions

#lis_rival discussion questions

The spotty bag was also used to collect delegate badges at the end of the day. This was mainly so that we can recycle them for other events. We also used the badges to make a prize draw for two books on LIS research donated to the event by Facet Publishing: Research, evaluation and audit edited by Maria J. Grant, Barbara Sen and Hannah Spring; Being evidence based in library and information practice edited by Denise Koufogiannakis and Alison Brettle. The lucky winners were Fred Saunderson of the National Library of Scotland and Becky Willson of Strathclyde University.

We’re pleased to report that the analysis of delegate feedback provided in the responses to the online survey that we circulated after the event shows that our efforts to deliver an interesting and valuable day paid off. Nineteen delegates took the trouble to complete the survey, giving us a 57% response rate. In summary, the majority gave the following ratings to the delivery of the event:

  • Excellent for the presentations, ease of registration and communication with/from the organisers
  • Excellent or very good for the opportunities for networking, the group discussion, the venue, and the catering

The analysis of the comments provided in the survey returns show that the delegates appreciated most of all the variety of the programme (including the opportunity to visit the War Poets Collection) and the diversity of delegates. They also remarked positively on the ‘very welcoming atmosphere’, opportunities for networking, and noted that the event was well organised.

There were a couple of comments that referred to the over-ambitious nature of one or two of the short presentations, with suggestions that the presenters could have done more to tailor their content and edit their slides accordingly. On the basis of two comments, we might have considered a more structured approached to networking and the delegate-led discussions. We also appreciate that 11th July was a very sunny day in Scotland and that the bright sunlight leaking in through the blinds sometimes made it difficult to read presentation slide content.

The feedback demonstrates a clear appetite for further events such as #lis_rival, with one delegate suggesting that he/she could host a follow-up at his/her university (although, since the surveys were completed anonymously we don’t know the identity of the person who made this kind offer! We hope that he/she will step make him/herself known on reading this blog post). Bruce and I would certainly be interested in taking part in #lis_rival2.

Finally, I’d just like to note here my appreciation of all the hard work that Bruce put into the organisation of #lis_rival. When we learnt in March that we had won the funding to offer this event I had just started treatment for breast cancer. Wednesday 11th July – the day of #lis_rival – was, in fact, only my third day on campus at Edinburgh Napier University following my return to work after sick leave. Since I was away from the office in the four months prior to the delivery of the event, Bruce worked almost single-handedly to develop the programme, publicise the event, and make all the practical arrangements for the day itself (with minimal input from me at a distance from my sickbay). The high ratings in the delegate feedback are all thanks to Bruce, and I cannot thank him enough for the fabulous job he made of delivering #lis_rival.

For further information about the event, please see the review on the Community, Connections, Knowledge web site (with session summaries), and the associated tweets.

RIVAL logo

Follow #lis_rival for updates on Research Impact Value & LIS at Edinburgh Napier today

RIVAL logo

Today we are hosting a one-day event on the theme of library and information science (LIS) research impact and value at Edinburgh Napier University’s Craiglockhart campus. My Centre for Social Informatics colleague Dr Bruce Ryan is the main organiser of this event.

We’re pleased that Research Impact Value and LIS (#lis_rival) has sold-out, and that we will have representation from across the LIS communities at Edinburgh Napier University today. Amongst the delegates to be welcomed are academic, health, national, prison, public, school, and special librarians, as well as LIS academics, professional body officers, and independent consultants. Continue reading

Successful submissions to #isic2018 for the Centre for Social Informatics

#ISIC2018 logoCongratulations to Alicja Pawluczuk and Lyndsey Middleton (née Jenkins) on the recent news that the conference submissions that they made in March this year to Information Seeking in Context (ISIC) 2018 have been accepted. The conference takes place in Kraków, Poland, 9-11 October 2018. Continue reading

Tacit knowledge sharing in online environments: paper available on OnlineFirst

Iris Buunk

Iris Buunk

The sixth of the seven articles that I recently co-authored for the Journal of Librarianship and Information Science (JoLIS) has now been published as an OnlineFirst paper. This is ‘Tacit knowledge sharing in online environments: locating ‘Ba’ within a platform for public sector professionals‘ by Iris Buunk, Colin F. Smith, and Hazel Hall. It reports findings from Iris‘ doctoral study, which I supervise with Colin.

With reference to the concept of Ba (Nonaka and Konno, 1998), and based on empirical research conducted in the UK public sector, we draw two main conclusions in our article. First, online social platforms play a strong role in the facilitation of tacit knowledge sharing, and this leads to outcomes of learning, expertise sharing, problem solving, and innovating. Second, such platforms are important to the initiation of discussions among experts, the fostering of collective intelligence, and making tacit and personal knowledge visible and accessible quickly, with minimal effort. Continue reading

Blurred reputations: new research on managing professional and private information online available on OnlineFirst

The fifth of the seven articles that I recently co-authored for the Journal of Librarianship and Information Science (JoLIS) has now been published as an OnlineFirst paper. In this article the paper co-authors – Frances Ryan, Peter Cruickshank, myself and Alistair Lawson – report on some of the main findings of Frances’ doctoral study on personal reputation building and management in online environments with specific reference to Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn. Continue reading

Applications and applicability of Social Cognitive Theory in information science research: paper available on OnlineFirst

Lyndsey Middleton née Jenkins

Lyndsey Middleton (née Jenkins)

The fourth of the seven articles that I recently co-authored for the Journal of Librarianship and Information Science (JoLIS) has now been published as an OnlineFirst paper. The article is entitled ‘Applications and applicability of Social Cognitive Theory in information science research’. Its content is concerned with the origins and key concepts of Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) and its value to Information Science research. Particular reference is made to SCT and its applicability to, and applications in, studies of information-seeking behaviour and use, and knowledge sharing.

This work is related to the ESRC/Skills Development Scotland doctoral study of Lyndsey Middleton (née Jenkins). It extends content that Lyndsey presented as a conference paper at Information: interactions and impact (i3) 2017 in June last year (slides available on SlideShare). The full manuscript of the article is also available to download from the Edinburgh Napier repository. Continue reading

Investigating the online and offline contexts of day-to-day democracy as participation spaces: newly published research by Ella Taylor-Smith and Colin Smith

Information, Communication and Society coverCongratulations to Centre for Social Informatics colleagues Dr Ella Taylor-Smith and Dr Colin Smith on the publication of their article ‘Investigating the online and offline contexts of day-to-day democracy as participation spaces’ in Information, Communication and Society.

The main theme of the article is citizen-led participation in democracy, and the online and offline spaces – introduced as ‘participation space’ – in which people work together to influence those in power, and to improve their communities. The findings draw upon a sociotechnical analysis of data from three case studies to expose the relationship between activities of local, grassroots democracy and the characteristics of the online and offline spaces in which it occurs. Continue reading